Technical eligibility
Work history, insured status considerations, and technical eligibility factors derived from intake responses.
Policy-Driven Scoring Engine
SSDIQ evaluates structured intake responses across technical, medical, and functional eligibility factors through a consistent framework designed for operational clarity and disability intake prioritization.
Policy-Driven Evaluation
Scoring Inputs
What goes into the score
Each claimant intake is assessed across technical, medical, functional, vocational, and treatment-related eligibility factors captured during intake.
Medical support
Conditions, treatment history, and provider involvement.
Functional limitations
Reported impact on daily activities, work capacity, and functional limitations relevant to case review.
Work activity & earnings
Current work status and vocational context.
Duration & treatment
Persistence of conditions, duration considerations, and consistency of care.
Combined Assessment
Case strength reflects the combined evaluation of multiple eligibility factors.
Scoring Flow
From intake to claim strength
Each claimant lead moves through a defined sequence designed to help disability firms focus reviewer attention more efficiently on stronger case opportunities.
Intake Responses
Structured responses collected through the claimant intake questionnaire, submitted by the claimant or entered by intake staff.
Scoring Algorithm
Intake responses are evaluated through a policy-driven scoring algorithm using structured technical, medical, and functional eligibility factors.
Evaluation Framework
Each eligibility factor is applied consistently across every intake, producing a structured score designed to support case organization and reviewer prioritization.
Claim Strength
Each lead receives a strength band designed to support reviewer prioritization and case organization.
Reading the Score
Understanding case strength
Disability attorneys, representatives, advocates, and reviewers use case strength to identify which cases need additional development and which are ready for attorney evaluation.
E
Excellent
85–100
High-priority case for disability attorney or representative evaluation or immediate follow-up.
S
Strong
70–84
Strong candidate for continued case development and reviewer attention.
M
Moderate
60–69
Worth closer evaluation. Identify missing information and gather additional case context.
L
Limited
45–59
Often benefits from additional development or supporting documentation.
F
Finite
0–44
Lower-priority case unless additional information becomes available.
Reviewer Guidance
Evaluate scores alongside intake responses and case briefs before making workflow decisions.
AI and Scoring Boundaries
Policy-driven scoring is separate from LLM case briefs.
SSDIQ separates deterministic scoring logic from generated case summaries to preserve transparency, operational integrity, and reviewer accountability.
Policy-Driven Scoring Engine
- Calculates scores from structured intake factors
- Applies consistent review criteria
- Supports case prioritization
LLM Case Briefs
- Summarize intake context for faster orientation
- Do not calculate scores
- Do not modify scores or predict outcomes
Scoring Methodology
Consistent case evaluation
SSDIQ helps disability intake teams review, prioritize, and organize claimant intake more consistently. The platform applies a structured, policy-driven evaluation framework informed by publicly available disability eligibility concepts and real-world Social Security disability intake review practices.
Designed to support intake workflows, not replace attorney judgment.
Foundations
Public policy grounding
Scoring grounded in public policy
SSDIQ is informed by publicly available disability evaluation concepts, including technical eligibility, medical support, vocational context, and functional limitations commonly reviewed during disability intake evaluation.
SSDIQ is an independent product and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Social Security Administration or any government agency.
Scoring formulas, weights, thresholds, and internal guardrails are not publicly disclosed to maintain system integrity.
Professional Use Note
SSDIQ supports intake evaluation and workflow prioritization. It is not a substitute for attorney review and does not constitute a legal determination or a prediction of claim outcome. Leads should be evaluated alongside supporting records, attorney judgment, and applicable legal standards.